A contemporary twist on this staple course in the law school curriculum, this introduction to property excites students with questions that connect foundational principles and real-world problems. We engage with wide range of challenging questions like: What is a “cyber-trespass”? Who really “owns” the Stanley Cup? How does “property” law address problems of homeless and poverty? Are racist trust funds illegal? Is downloading music “stealing”? Those topics are in addition to traditional core issues of real and personal property, like boundaries, possession, estates, future interests, trusts and Aboriginal perspectives on property. Following the structure of Canada’s leading property law casebook, equal attention is given to conceptual and doctrinal aspects of the law. Emphasis is placed on the analytical skills required for legal practice, while never losing sight of public policy issues and social justice concerns.
The overarching objective of this course is to introduce you to the basics of property law in an exciting and engaging way, so that you’ll want to learn more about it throughout law school and your professional career.
You’ll need some important information about when and where our property law class meets, how the classes will run, the learning tools we’ll use, and so on. In the 2015-16 academic year, our class will meet as follows.
There are 4 opportunities for evaluation and feedback in the property law course: 2 responsive commentaries, a final exam and a property dispute resolution quiz. A practice midterm acts as dress rehearsal for the final.
Students who require accommodations or academic support because of a physical or learning disability, or any condition that affects their ability to learn, should read more about tutorials and supports.
What is “property”? Who gets to “own” property, and why? What kinds of “things” get protected? These basic questions will be addressed in the practical context of controversies over ownership of news, sports scores, genetic materials and even people.
With all the talk about property as a “right” and not a “thing”, it is easy to forget that rights often relate to tangible physical objects, and that spatial issues are extremely important. At the same time, there’s a legal line drawn between tangible and intangible resources.
This lesson is about limits on proprietary freedom: to what extent can a private owner control future uses of property? We will revisit the justifications of private property, and continue to explore the intersection between property rights and other values.
This lesson looks at principles of equity, a topic that has been mentioned earlier in this course and likely examined in other courses as well. The focus is on the modern law of trusts, including express, resulting and constructive trusts.
By now you’ll know that it is impossible to properly understand the law of property in a vacuum. So lesson 2 provides a contextual basis for our study of property law, with particular focus on the social, economic and political issues that impact resource allocation.
You’ve all heard it said that possession is 9/10 of the law. Is it really? What does that mean anyways? Since when could we talk about law with fractions? Well, let me preempt your economic analysis by simply saying that possession is an important property principle.
Canadian courts have defined Aboriginal title as a sui generis blend of common law and Aboriginal conceptions of land ownership. This lesson explores the source, nature and importance of Aboriginal property rights in Canada.